Are we the enemy? Support for amnesty for Iraqi insurgents who have killed American troops

This is a three-month-old story, but it received almost no coverage, and seems to me to be the clearest example to date of one party's homicidal lack of concern for our fighting forces, and that party's desire to provide aid and comfort to the enemy currently engaged in combat with our troops.

The statements below are particularly piquant in light of the trio of books just featured, portraying liberals as terrorist enablers, death-mongers, or heirs of Nazi German ideology, and written by highly visible and respected members of the right wing (i.e., not Ann Coulter).

(From AMERICAblog)

This afternoon [6/15/2006] on the Senate floor, several Senate Republicans are DEFENDING the proposal to give amnesty to terrorists who have killed or wounded American troops. Here is a quick compilation:

MCCONNELL SUGGESTED A RESOLUTION COMMENDING IRAQIS FOR GIVING TERRORISTS AMNESTY. “…might it not just be as useful an exercise to be trying to pass a resolution commending the Iraqi government for the position that they’ve taken today with regard to this discussion of Amnesty?” – Sen. Mitch McConnell [R-KY]

ALEXANDER COMPARED IRAQI AMNESTY FOR TERRORISTS TO NELSON MANDELA’S PEACE EFFORTS. “Is it not true that Nelson Mandela's courage and his ability to create a process of reconciliation and forgiveness was a major factor in what has been a political miracle in Africa…Did not Nelson Mandela, win a - the co-winner of - a noble Nobel Peace Prize just for this sort of gesture?” – Sen. Lamar Alexander [R-TN]

CORNYN: IRAQI AMNESTY DEBATE IS “A DISTRACTION.” “It makes no sense for the United States Senate to shake its finger at the new government of Iraq and to criticize them… it really is a distraction from the debate that I think the American people would want us to have.” - Sen. John Cornyn [R-TX; previously expressed understanding of why alleged fury at 'activist judges' led to murder of a judge, and murders of two family members of another judge.]

CHAMBLISS: AMNESTY IS OK FOR EX-INSURGENTS AS LONG AS THEY ARE ON OUR SIDE NOW. “Is it not true today that we have Iraqis who are fighting the war against the insurgents, who at one time fought against American troops and other coalition troops as they were marching to Baghdad, who have now come over to our side and are doing one heck of a job of fighting along, side by side, with Americans and coalition forces, attacking and killing insurgents on a daily basis?” - Sen. Saxby Chambliss [R-GA; ran a 2002 campaign against Max Cleeland, a Vietnam veteran and triple amputee (Chambliss received a deferral) wherein he placed photos of Cleeland and Osama bin Laden side by side]

TED STEVENS - “IF THAT’S AMNESTY, I’M FOR IT:” “I really believe we ought to try to find some way to encourage that country to demonstrate to those people who have been opposed to what we're trying to do, that it's worthwhile for them and their children to come forward and support this democracy. And if that's amnesty, I'm for it. I'd be for it. And if those people who are, come forward… if they bore arms against our people, what's the difference between those people that bore arms against the Union in the War between the States? What’s the difference between the Germans and Japanese and all the people we’ve forgiven?” – Sen. Ted Stevens [R-AK; author of $220 million dollar pork 'bridge to nowhere']